Martians who’ve been accompanying my every ululation
and undulation since 2016 might well scratch their heads and wonder if
everything they’d been told about the British weather is a load of old Boris.
Rain seems to intervene only infrequently. It’s a fair cop. I choose the days
on which I walk carefully, aided by the panoply of modern forecasting - multiple
sources, weather radar etc. etc . And
yet…
Even in the twenty-first century the Met and BBC
sometimes contrive to get things so annoyingly wrong. Like today, for instance.
At eight this morning there was no mention of precipitation anywhere near Oundle.
Yet here I am two hours later, standing outside Barnwell’s Montagu Arms, and the rain’s hosing down. But hey, I have an
anorak, and an umbrella, and Goretex boots.
What’s the problem with a little dampness now and again? I’m told it’s
what you have to expect as you get older.
In one way, there’s no problem at all. Walking in the
rain can be a blast. I have very happy memories of getting soaked in various
nice places throughout my life. At the age of twelve and half way up Snowdon,
quizzing mystified passers-by on what they were doing there and where they’d
come from for a National Parks survey, I learned that if you were wet through
to your underwear, eventually you dried out again, quite possibly several times
in one day. A first girlfriend got persuaded into the Kentish woodlands in a
cataclysmic downpour because we weren’t going to let a little thing like that
prevent our courting, were we? (and we’re still corresponding as friends more
than fifty years later so it can’t have been too bad an experience). According
to the Baptists, childhood Bank Holiday Mondays were made by God for walking
and family bonding, and were then as now usually blessed not just in showers
but in torrents.
Sod’s law operates. The first part of today’s walk isn’t
along roads but tracks through fields of barley and wheat, where the farmer has
very helpfully cut good paths for the rights-of-way. But they are rather narrow paths, and the grain has seeded
down the middle, in a rather exaggerated version of the way grass grows down
the middle of extreme country lanes. After a few hundred metres I’m soaked to
the waist; boots, socks, trousers, anorak, M & S n’all. I squelch for most
of the rest of the day.
The paths on the way to Thurning are well kept but
often ridged by the tyres of farm vehicles. I’m quite surprised how quickly
they’ve become tacky/slippery, and how much dirt is accumulating on my boots.
It’s hard going. I turn away from the Alconbury Brook up to the village, which
is a collection of lovely houses in a compact summer-flowery settlement whose
population struggles to make three figures. I’m disappointed not to find St.
James the Great open, because the excellent Northamptonshire
Surprise website says ‘The best Arts
and Crafts church in the county…a perfect, if small, well-preserved example of
Anglican high church decoration…The spirit of William Morris hovers here –
indeed the draperies come from his emporium.’
I’ll have to come back.
This week courtesy of Radio 4’s The Life Scientific I’ve become aware of the ‘Dunbar number’, named
after its anthropologist ‘inventor’ Robin Dunbar. As an undergrad Dunbar
studied under the great Nico Tinbergen at Oxford, and based on a lifetime study
of both animals and humans his contention is that there’s a more-or-less magic
number of 150, which is the quantity of individuals with whom the average human
being can maintain stable relationships. Extroverts may manage more, introverts
less. He also connects the number to the average size of medieval settlements
(by which ancient standard, Thurning is today on the smaller, less sustainable
end of the spectrum). Dunbar’s number raises a number of interesting questions
for me. The first is whether this is merely ‘true but trivial’ - insofar as
there’s only so much time in the day,
and staying close to even the most intimate circle of friends is sometimes
difficult. Keeping up regularly with as many as 150 seems to preclude work,
telly or days out walking, but please understand this is me talking - at best a
‘sociable introvert’, aka miserable git! Another intriguing possibility is
whether at this precise moment in human history Dunbar’s metric might be changing.
Is it easier to keep in touch with more
people now because of social media? Or are the people we’re close to more
demanding than they were, so in practice, might Dunbar’s number actually be decreasing? And what does this
have to say about patterns of church organisation and church growth? We’re apt to be very worried when
congregations fall in number. Is 150 the optimum size at which we should aim
before we divide or re-plant (And I hear a lot of people say ‘We should be so lucky…’) And what would
Dunbar predict about the combining of
communities, say, making one from two lots of fifty. Does this result in a successful
congregation of one hundred? Or does our church experience lead us to think the
actual number would be much less than that. A problem for the Church is that we
become very attached to our roles. If Gladys is the inadequate organist in
church A, perhaps discouraging people from attending services where her poor
accompanying and scatter of wrong notes are only too obvious, but is replaced by
the organist from church B when the two churches combine (who may be able to
dash off Widor’s Toccata to the satisfaction at least of himself, if not
entirely to the more musically snobby, thus maintaining the numbers at the
Sunday Eucharist), do we think Gladys will be among the congregation to
appreciate his superior skills? Perhaps not.
On the door of St. James in Thurning is a woven picture
of a pilgrim; hat, staff and scrip. He looks not altogether unlike me. I try a
selfie, for the purposes of comparison, and fail hopelessly. It’s a
generational thing. Appropriately for the dedication of the church, there’s a
scallop shell on the gate. I’ll see one or two more during the day in various
places. Opposite the church in the old school building is ‘Jade College’ where pilgrims can learn holistic massage, which
might come in quite handy for travellers.
I retrace my steps to the Alconbury stream, which
gives its name to today’s next village destination ‘Luddington-in-the-Brook’. The suffix is to
distinguish it from a village up the road, now usually called Lutton, formerly
known as ‘Luddington-in-the-Wold’.
Today’s walk is unusual insofar that it takes in all the villages in the
newly-named ‘Brookfields’ benefice
bar Lutton: a reminder that incumbents like Cathy Brazier have a Herculean task
as they draw together a collection of Dunbar country communities to love and
serve each other. Judging by the jolly, engaged, edition of the Brookfields mag I pick up later in
Polebrook, she and they’re making a good fist of it.
However. As you’ll see from the foregoing, the
question keeps nagging away as to whether this is the future of our Church. I
think the parochial system is worth hanging on to, if for no other reason than
that national disaster might one day make it crucially important. So then
people, let’s not just sell off our ancient churches for private housing. But
what could be done with Church/public/private initiatives, to supplement our
Christian functions in a community-facilitating way? We’re getting used to food
banks. What other kind of banks, for profit or not-for-profit might our churches
host without compromising the core salvation enterprise – and maybe even
enhancing it? Villages (or Dunbar communities anywhere) need honest, artisan
shops, and opportunities to share – machinery/ transport/ coffee. And yes, cake
with the caffeine, if you must.
I walk on to Hemington. As Johnny Nash once opined: ‘I can
see clearly now, the rain has gone/It’s gonna be a bright (sing those b/v’s,
soul-sisters) (bright), bright, sunshiny day’ – and it’s now warm and humid
enough that I choose a route along the road, rather than the longer one through
the fields. On either side are fields of barley, wheat and (less pleasingly)
decaying oil-seed. The corn isn’t toasty yellow-brown yet, but it’s going that
way, with just that interesting, sophisticated undershade of not-quite green
where the breeze is rippling the surface. Hemington’s church, at the top of the rise, is
shut and barred - as Luddington’s was - but it gets a good press from other
writers on the Web. On the little green at the end of the village’s Main
Street, is a pretty decorated sign telling you what you need to know about Hemington
. Around the bend I pass a large and ancient , spreading, oak tree, which may
be the one depicted on the sign. Another scallop has been tacked in at head height
onto its bark.
I walk the straight lane towards Polebrook with the site of the
World War 2 airfield on my right. In the distance I can see the one remaining
collection of surviving buildings from that era, now re-purposed. In the
fifties the airfield had something of a revival. It sited a deployment of Thor
ICBMs which were the West’s nuclear shield at the time. The now-available
accounts of the reliability of these missiles is hair-raising. If there’d been
an attack to which we and the Americans had responded, the chances of
successful launches on our behalf would appear to have been slim. One imagines
the Russians would have done no better. But only one missile needed to get
through for the death of millions. MADness indeed. Deterrents don’t have to
work. The protagonists just have to be in doubt that they will. And what don’t we know today about the details of
our own ‘security’?
All Saints in Polebrook is the only church I find open today,
and very lovely and moving it is, not least because of the beautiful chapel in
its surprisingly spacious transept which is dedicated to the memory of the
American WW2 flyers stationed locally. Amongst their number was the heart-throb
actor Clark Gable, who was strapped in for a few missions over Germany for
publicity and propaganda reasons (which is not to minimise the risks he
undertook). The most literally awesome story is that of Lt Truemper and Sgt
Mathies. They were aboard a Flying Fortress (nicknamed Ten Horsepower) on a bombing mission over Leipzig when it was
attacked by German fighters. The co-pilot was killed, the pilot severely
wounded. Truemper told Mathies to take over the controls of the ‘plane (neither
had any flying experience) while he did the navigating. They contrived to get
back to the very fringes of Polebrook. All the other crew were ordered to parachute
to safety, while Truemper and Mathies attempted to land. They crashed into a
nearby field and were killed. It’s an extraordinary and humbling story. No spur
of the moment gallantry this, but calculated self-sacrifice on behalf of
others, which makes it all the more suitable as a focus for the attention of
worshippers at All Saints, and passers-by like me.
Just over the border in Cambridgeshire is the village
of Little Gidding, subject of one of T.S.Eliot’s Four Quartets, poems seasonal,
contemplative, of Time and Eternity, and apt to my moment alone in Polebrook’s
ancient church.
‘You are not
here to verify,/ Instruct yourself, or inform curiosity/ Or carry report. You
are here to kneel/ Where prayer has been valid. And prayer is more/ Than an
order of words, the conscious occupation/ Of the praying mind, or the sound of
the voice praying. / And what the dead had no speech for, when living, /They
can tell you, being dead: the communication/ Of the dead is tongued with fire
beyond the language of the living./ Here, the intersection of the timeless
moment/ Is England and nowhere. Never and always.’
The route back to the car takes me through the elevated
hamlet of Armston, and then across the fields behind Barnwell Manor, one time
country home of Prince Richard and his family, although they now live a less
expensive life in Kensington Palace. The Manor has become an up-market
(presumably very upmarket!) venue for the display of antiques. One cannot duck
economic necessity. But for royalty, the Church, all of us as individuals, pain
is thereby entailed.
Tears for
souvenirs: 19.5 km. 6 hrs. 23 deg. Rain and sun, and an
enlivening breeze. 1 stile. 16 gates. 4 little bridges. Slugs a-plenty. A
buzzard on the hunt. Guns popping on the Barnwell estate. 4 villages. 4
churches. One open.
Dear Lord
I carry in my
heart always:
‘Summer and winter, and spring-time and harvest,
Sun, moon and stars in their courses above,
Join with all nature in manifold witness
To thy great faithfulness, mercy and love...’
And as the
congregation with one voice sings:
‘Pardon for sin, and a peace that endureth,
Thine own dear presence to cheer and to guide;
Strength for today and bright hope for tomorrow,
Blessings all mine, with ten thousand beside’…*
I shed tears.
Amen.
* from 'Great is thy faithfulness': Thomas Obadiah Chisholm 1866-1960
No comments:
Post a Comment